Every student of biological evolution learns about peppered moths: the dramatic increase in dark forms of this species during the industrial revolution, and experiments pointing to differential bird predation as the cause. Read More ›
The elegant form and protective covering of the coiled nautilus, the interdependent parts of the vertebrate eye, and the interlocking bones, muscles, and feathers of a bird wing “give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose.” Read More ›
In discussions of evolution, both evolution skeptics and those who embrace neo-Darwinian evolution are prone to make one of two significant mistakes. Both stem from a failure to distinguish between microevolution and macroevolution. Read More ›
This article shows that there are numerous legitimate scientific challenges to core tenets of Darwinian theory, as well as predominant theories of chemical evolution. Read More ›
"The Darwinist claim that 'theory' is always and exclusively used by scientists to mean a verified and well-established explanation is a fiction invented by Darwinists seeking grounds to scold as ignorant those Darwin-skeptics who call evolution 'just a theory.'" Read More ›
Most of the public takes a broad view: “science” is an unrestricted search for the truth about nature based on reasoning from physical evidence. By those lights, intelligent design is indeed science. Read More ›
Many modern biologists have noted that the term "evolution" can mean different things. And this means that not all senses of evolution have the same epistemological standing. Read More ›
Just when scientists thought they understood how natural processes explained the order of the universe, they discovered a very special kind of complexity, called information, in nature. Read More ›
