Evolutionists often claim that universal common ancestry and the “tree of life” are established facts.
But what is the evidence for their claim, and how much of it is based upon assumptions? Read More ›
Professor Michael Behe invites us to review the sweep of his argument for intelligent design, as he has presented it in his books and other publications. Read More ›
Whether we realize it or not, we detect design constantly in our everyday lives. In fact, our lives often depend on inferring intelligent design. Read More ›
Neither chance nor necessity, nor the combination of the two, can explain the origin of information starting from purely physical-chemical antecedents. Causal powers of both natural entities and intelligent agency suggests intelligent design as the best explanation. Read More ›
Every student of biological evolution learns about peppered moths: the dramatic increase in dark forms of this species during the industrial revolution, and experiments pointing to differential bird predation as the cause. Read More ›
ID appeals to science to confute certain tenets of Darwinism and Michael Behe and William Dembski, for example, have developed criteria for testing design inferences. Read More ›
The fundamental difficulty for any undirected process of evolution is being able to see into the future and determine what functions that organism will need to survive. Read More ›