Many different pieces of evidence pointing to design in nature could be adduced, but we decided to distill it all down to six major lines of evidence. Read More ›
For many, chance and necessity set the boundaries of scientific explanation, but they have proven insufficient to account for all scientific phenomena. Read More ›
Even more mysterious than the fact that our location is so congenial to diverse measurement and discovery is that these same conditions appear to correlate with habitability. Read More ›
Whether we realize it or not, we detect design constantly in our everyday lives. In fact, our lives often depend on inferring intelligent design. Read More ›
Neither chance nor necessity, nor the combination of the two, can explain the origin of information starting from purely physical-chemical antecedents. Causal powers of both natural entities and intelligent agency suggests intelligent design as the best explanation. Read More ›
ID appeals to science to confute certain tenets of Darwinism and Michael Behe and William Dembski, for example, have developed criteria for testing design inferences. Read More ›
Dr. Meyer argues that no current materialistic theory of evolution can account for the origin of the information necessary to build novel animal forms. He proposes intelligent design as an alternative explanation for the origin of biological information and the higher taxa. Read More ›
Conservation of information theorems indicate that any search algorithm performs, on average, as well as random search without replacement unless it takes advantage of problem-specific information about the search target or the search-space structure. Read More ›